Community Gardens in Budapest, Challenges and Opportunities
Article Main Content
Community gardens have a long history worldwide. They offer an opportunity to reconnect the urban fabric ruptured by vacant plots, foster social connections, build community spirit, and promote sustainability. However, they have to face several challenges and obstacles like legal procedures, financial support and the changing engagements of the local communities. This trend appeared in Hungary relatively lately, about a decade ago. The paper focuses on vacant inner-city plots in Budapest. We analyse the situation and follow the story of four existing community gardens. We decipher the challenges they go through, especially their temporary status, the changing political circumstances and the accepting or rejecting attitude of the local population. On the other hand, we present the crucial role of NGOs and local communities in keeping these projects alive and raising awareness to improve their impact, improving city life.
References
-
Attili, G. (2013). Urban Agricultures: Spatial, Social and Environmental Transformations in Rome. Cescontexto. Debates No 2, June, 245-256
Google Scholar
1
-
Bende, C., & Nagy, G. (2020). Community gardens in post-socialist Hungary: Differences and similarities. Geographia Polonica, 93(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.7163/gpol.0170.
Google Scholar
2
-
Csapat, D. (n.d.). Közösségi Kertek. Közösségi Kertek. Retrieved September 28, 2022, from http://kozossegikertek.hu/kertek
Google Scholar
3
-
Darly, Segolene & McClintock, Nathan. (2017). Introduction to Urban Agriculture in the Neoliberal City: Critical European Perspectives. ACME: An International Journal of Critical Geographies, 16. 224-231. Retrieved from https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1598.
Google Scholar
4
-
Demailly, Kaduna-Eve & Darly, Segolene. (2017). Urban agriculture on the move in Paris: The routes of temporary gardening in the neoliberal city. ACME: An International Journal of Critical Geographies, 16. 332-361. Retrieved from https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1384.
Google Scholar
5
-
Fáczányi, Z. (2017). The Interpretation of Budapest's Community Gardens from the Approach of Landscape Architecture and Sociology. [Doctoral dissertation, SZIU, Budapest].
Google Scholar
6
-
Hou, J. (2017). Urban Community Gardens as Multimodal Social Spaces. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4113-6_6.
Google Scholar
7
-
Koroļova, A., & Treija, S. (2018, December 1). Urban Gardening as a Multifunctional Tool to Increase Social Sustainability in the City. Architecture and Urban Planning, 14(1), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2018-0012
Google Scholar
8
-
Lawson, L. (2005, May 30). City Bountiful. In A Century of Community Gardening in America. University of California Press, Ltd.
Google Scholar
9
-
Overmeyer, K. (2007, July 1). Urban Pioneers. In Temporary Use and Urban Development in Berlin. JOVIS.
Google Scholar
10
-
Temel R. & Haydn F. (2006). Temporary urban spaces: concepts for the use of city spaces. Birkhäuser.
Google Scholar
11
-
Tornaghi, C. (2014, February 5). Critical geography of urban agriculture. Progress in Human Geography, 38(4), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513512542.
Google Scholar
12
-
Uthman, O. (2007). Environmental factors, neighbourhood deprivation, and under-five mortality in Nigeria: an exploratory spatial data analysis. The Internet Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatology, 9(1), 1–9.
Google Scholar
13
-
WUR Consultancy Group. (2015). It's Not Easy Being Green: A Budapest Story, Synthesis Report. Wageningen University.
Google Scholar
14





