An Analysis of Neoclassical Elements and Environmental Process of the National Assembly Complex of Nigeria
Article Main Content
The National Assembly building is an iconic architecture and an edifice that symbolises the presence and practice of democracy. The Nigeria National assembly building is neoclassical in style; characterised by elements and features traceable to the architecture of the neoclassical period that span through 17th and 18th century. The roof, walls, grandeur of scale, geometric form as well as the environmental impact were analysed. The work established the meeting point between democracy and architecture, it revealed various measures incorporated in the design to mitigate environmental impact as well as sustainable building solutions including solar panel, elevated floor, building management systems, bioclimatic package, and natural light optimization among others. It recommended the inclusion of measures that will mitigate environmental impact of resource consumption on site as well as environmentally friendly practices during and after construction.
References
-
Adeagbo, A. A., and Omodunbi, O. O. (2019). Election gifting and the ordeal of democracy in Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 15(5), 1857–7881.
Google Scholar
1
-
Alomaim, A. (2016). Nation Building in Kuwait 1961–1991. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture. University of California, Los Angeles. https://escholarship.org/content/qt91b0909n/qt91b0909n.pdf.
Google Scholar
2
-
Brant, J. & Cavallaro, F. (2018). The characteristics of 12 architectural styles from antiquity to the present day. https://www.archdaily.com/900027/the-characteristics-of-12-architectural-styles-from-antiquity-to-the-present-day.
Google Scholar
3
-
Choudhury, B. Z. (2020). Jatio Sangsad Bhaban or National Assembly Building and Sustainability. Journal of Engineering Science 11(2), 127–132.
Google Scholar
4
-
Chris Reardon (2013). https://www.yourhome.gov.au/you-begin/design-process.
Google Scholar
5
-
Galuzin, A. (2019). Neoclassical Architecture Style and Defining Characteristics. Retrieved on 6th February, 2020 from https://www.worldofleveldesign.com/categories/architecture/neoclassical/neoclassical_architecture.php.
Google Scholar
6
-
Goitom, H. (2017). National Parliaments: Nigeria. https://www.loc.gov/law/help/national-parliaments/nigeria.php.
Google Scholar
7
-
Irizarry, J., Zolfagharian, S., Nourbakhsh, M., Mohamad-zin, R., Jusoff, K., &Zakaria, R. (2012). The development of sustainable construction planning system. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 17(1), 1874–4753.
Google Scholar
8
-
Jenkins, K. (2013). Art Nouveau architecture in Riga. https://velvetescape.com/art-nouveau-architecture-in-riga/.
Google Scholar
9
-
Khasreen, M. M., Banfill, P. F. G. and Menzies, G. F. (2009). Life-cycle assessment and the environmental impact of buildings: A review. Sustainability,1(3), 674–701.
Google Scholar
10
-
Ksiazek, S., (1993). Architectural Culture in the Fifties: Louis Kahn and the National Assembly Complex in Dhaka. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 52 (4), 416–435.
Google Scholar
11
-
Nwanolue, B. O. G. & Ojukwu, U. G. (2012). Legislative efficiency and democratic stability in the fourth republic governance and politics of Nigeria: A re-appraisal of national assembly. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(9), 116–131.
Google Scholar
12
-
Okeke, R. C. (2017). Political Culture, Democracy and Development in Nigeria. Specialty Journal of Politics and Law, 2(4), 1–9.
Google Scholar
13
-
Pulaski, M. H. (Ed.). Field Guide for Sustainable Construction. Washington: Pentagon renovation and construction program office, 2004.
Google Scholar
14
-
Reardon, C. (2013). The design process. https://www.yourhome.gov.au/you-begin/design-process.
Google Scholar
15
-
Rogers, K. (2020). Retrieved 11th March, 2020 from https://www.britannica.com/art/Neoclassical-architecture.
Google Scholar
16
-
Thomas, N. I. R. & Costa, D. B. (2017). Adoption of environmental practices on construction sites. Ambiente Construído, Porto Alegre, 17(4), 9–24.
Google Scholar
17





